We know everything about bankruptcy
The DIA's claim was that the persons named in the claim were allegedly involved in making decisions that were economically unfavorable for the bank, which ultimately led to the debtor's insolvency.
In a number of instances, this position was supported, however, the Economic Board considered the fact of influence of the named persons on these decisions unproven.
The Supreme Court of Russia has identified a number of signs by which it becomes real to bring specific persons to subsidiary liability.
Among them, the following were named:
the fact of a significant influence of the defendants on the activities of the debtor, established by the court;
the comparability of the size of the resulting negative consequences from the transactions, the scale of the debtor's activities and the volume of creditors' claims;
the benefit of the defendant from the transaction made by the debtor, established by the court.
When considering the case, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation noted the complexity of the management structure of credit institutions - due to it, it is difficult to say unequivocally, who specifically influenced the fateful decisions, this must be examined in detail by the court (decision of November 10, 2021 No. 305-ES19-14439 ( 3-8) in case No. А40-208852 / 2015).
"*" - Fields marked with are obligatory fields.
Website Rusbankrot.ru uses cookies. If you continue to browse our pages, you agree to this condition. You can change the cookie settings in the browser settings.