THE COURT DID NOT SATISFY THE APPLICATION FOR REPAYMENT OF DEBTS OF THE CHELYABINSK SOTSGOROD FUND

THE COURT DID NOT SATISFY THE APPLICATION FOR REPAYMENT OF DEBTS OF THE CHELYABINSK SOTSGOROD FUND

THE COURT DID NOT SATISFY THE APPLICATION FOR REPAYMENT OF DEBTS OF THE CHELYABINSK SOTSGOROD FUND
The Chelyabinsk Arbitration Court considered the appeal of Vladimir Sinitsyn, who stated that he wanted to close the debts of the bankrupt Sotsgorod Fund (case no.A76-8268/2024). But the court refused Sinitsyn's request. Information about this is posted in the file of arbitration cases.

An attempt to settle the obligations was made back in the spring. On March 4, 2025, Sinitsyn filed a petition in which he expressed his readiness to completely close the creditors' claims. 

The court, in turn, several times provided the applicant with the opportunity to document the fulfillment of promises. The rulings were issued on March 18, April 22, June 4, and August 5. But by the time of the last meeting, there was no proof of payment in the file. The court explicitly stated that there was no evidence of repayment of debt obligations. 

Sinitsyn, in his defense, filed a motion requesting that the meeting be postponed. He referred to the fact that the tax service allegedly did not return to him the funds mistakenly transferred to the wrong banking details. However, the arbitration court considered these arguments to be untenable. 

The Court pointed out that since May 2025, the applicant had had enough time to resolve the situation. As a result, in accordance with Article 158 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation, the application for postponement of the hearing was left without satisfaction. At the same time, the court stressed that Sinitsyn retains the right to reapply with a similar statement if he can confirm the actual repayment of debts. In the meantime, the requirements of the authorized body have been declared outstanding, which became the basis for the refusal.

Let us remind you that the problems of the Sotsgorod Foundation began more than a year ago. In March last year, the organization filed a claim for recognition of its own insolvency. The reason was the debt in the amount of 11.3 million. Then the fund applied for the introduction of a monitoring procedure and inclusion in the register of creditors of the claims of the Ministry of Property. 

The history of the Chelyabinsk foundation, which found itself in bankruptcy, continues to evolve. The court reiterated that without documentary evidence of the fulfillment of obligations, one cannot expect to satisfy applications in the framework of the bankruptcy case.

   

Photo: Freepik

05.09.2025