Search

SUPREME COURT: THE INSURANCE COMPANY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BANK'S LOSSES, NOT THE BORROWER

The couple took out a mortgage loan from the bank, simultaneously concluding a personal insurance contract, the beneficiary of which was the bank. When the husband died, the ... ... courts indicated that the debtor would subsequently be able to file a claim for damages to the insurance company. However, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation did not agree with the arguments of the lower courts. He recalled that it is the insurance ...

A CHANCE FOR SALVATION. THE COURT PROTECTED THE BANK'S CLIENT FROM FRAUDSTERS

The bank appealed to the court with a claim to the citizen for the recovery of funds under the loan agreement, and the defendant filed ... ... contract as not concluded. The courts of three instances satisfied the bank's claims, rejecting the defendant's objections. The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation sent the dispute for a new consideration (the Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian ...

BUDGET MONEY WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO ALL CREDITORS OF THE BANKRUPT

In the framework of the bankruptcy case (No. A32-55433/17), the courts considered a dispute on challenging priority payments. The bankruptcy trustee ... ... municipal and state contracts, giving, in fact, these funds executive immunity. This approach was not shared, however, by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, which considered the complaint of the bankruptcy trustee and concluded that there were ...

Sorted by relevance | Sort by date