Search

Supreme Court of Russia resolved the issue of the bank's beneficiaries brought to subsidiary liability

The Economic Board considered the case at the request of the bankruptcy trustee of the bank - the Deposit Insurance Agency - on bringing a number of beneficiaries of the credit institution to subsidiary liability. The positions of the judges of the lower instances were divided, the case went through not a single round of challenge and finally reached the Highest court of Russia. The DIA's claim was that the persons named in the claim were allegedly involved in making decisions that were economically unfavorable for the bank, which ultimately led to the debtor's insolvency. In a number of instances, this position was supported, however,...

EX-HEADS OF THE MIR BANK WERE ATTRACTED TO A SUBSIDY OF 1.38 BILLION

... several ex-managers of Mir Bank to the subsidiary. The agency, which is entrusted with the bankruptcy management procedure, tried to recover a large sum from ten top managers. However, in respect of two persons from the list presented in the petition, the DIA court refused. The resolution published on the website of the judicial file on March 21, 2024, indicates Dmitry Kazorin and Roman Semiokhin, whom the arbitration did not bring to subsidiary liability in the bankruptcy case of AKB Mir (No. A40-19793/2017). Georgy Zaremba, Oleg and Kristina Demidovich, Anatoly Shepel, Sergey Shipov, Veronika Egorikova, Tatyana Pinchuk and Alexander Mironov will be responsible for the obligations ...

Sorted by relevance | Sort by date