Search

THE SUPREME COURT DIVIDED PASSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CREDITORS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF A MANAGER

... agreement was to transfer the debtor's property to a third party for safekeeping. At the same time, as a payment for storage, the counterparty received the right to use the property, as well as the right to lease it to third parties. The claims of the bankruptcy creditors boiled down to the fact that the safekeeping agreement on the agreed terms was not a good deal, and the manager should have taken measures to withdraw from it. A letter from one of the bankruptcy creditors of the property transferred ...

Sorted by relevance | Sort by date