Search

Search

 

1 - 5 of 5
First | Prev. | 1 | Next | Last

THE SUPREME COURT RECOVERED DAMAGES FROM THE BANK FOR AN ERRONEOUS PAYMENT

... bank in accordance with the instructions, bringing it to responsibility in the form of losses is legitimate, since the funds had to be transferred in exact accordance with the details of the payment order, which includes the TIN. This position is a precedent, since the previous practice was uniform in the matter that the bank's responsibilities do not include checking the TIN of the payee, and, accordingly, the recovery of losses is unlawful. Thus, the Supreme Court has protected consumers who are not persons who are aware of the specifics of the banks' operations and need additional guarantees of their rights in the event of a bank error in the details of the recipient of the transfer. Photo: Sale ...

Modified: 07.06.2022
Supreme Court , precedent , bank , fraud
Path: РусБанкрот - СМИ

Supreme Court eliminated a problem of uncertainty in bankruptcy case

The Judicial Board for Economic Disputes of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation had to deal with a dilemma related to the binding nature of court decisions encountered in bankruptcy cases. On April 20, 2022, the judges issued a ruling related to case No. А53-24369/2019. On July 15, 2019, ...

Modified: 04.28.2022
bankruptcy , precedent , bankruptcy of companies , Supreme Court
Path: РусБанкрот - СМИ

Supreme Court of Russia to decide whether it is necessary to apply to the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property to approve a store sign

The case of the pharmacy chain ‘Rigla’ has reached the Supreme Court, which will decide on the use of the logo on the sign. There are quite a lot of situations when a trademark is registered for one person, and another structure conducts activities under it. In a number of cases, local authorities refuse ...

Modified: 02.24.2022
Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property , pharmacy , Rigla , court , Supreme Court , trademark , precedent
Path: РусБанкрот - СМИ

THE SUPREME COURT SIDED WITH BANKRUPT AND DEFENDED MEMORIAL VALUE

... other day by the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes. The situation that developed during the bankruptcy case of Zhanna Karepanova (case №. А71-1097 / 2020) caused controversy among lawyers and ordinary people. According to experts, the decision of the Supreme Court may create a precedent in Russian law enforcement practice and affect not only the legal, but also the moral and ethical aspects of bankruptcy. The complaint of the financial manager Olesya Ogorodnikova against the court verdicts was considered on July 1.They did ...

Modified: 07.12.2021
bankruptcy , precedent , memorial value , bankruptcy estate , court , Supreme Court
Path: РусБанкрот - СМИ

THE SUPREME COURT HAS DETERMINED THE TERMS OF PAYMENT OF DEBTS ON BANKRUPTCY BY THIRD PARTIES

... by third parties is regulated by Article 313 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Earlier, in a conversation with journalists of the Kommersant newspaper, the experts stated that disputes as a result of such payments arise quite often and a precedent decision of the Supreme Court is necessary to form a law enforcement practice in similar cases.

Modified: 04.28.2021
bankruptcy , Supreme Court , Chernomyrdin , debt repayment , precedent
Path: РусБанкрот - СМИ
1 - 5 of 5
First | Prev. | 1 | Next | Last

Sorted by relevance | Sort by date