Search

THE SUPREME COURT OF RUSSIA DID NOT ALLOW THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE DEBTOR'S ASSETS IN BANKRUPTCY

... the manager found the property, and decided to challenge the deal, but was not supported by the judges. As for the highest court, its board, having examined the case materials in detail, came to the opposite conclusion. According to the judges of the Supreme Court, the parties to the concluded transactions were interconnected and could well pursue a common interest, in particular, the withdrawal of the debtor's assets just before the bankruptcy. Having established a connection between the participants in legal relations, and also recalling that the price of real estate was still different from the market price, the Supreme Court of Russia canceled the decisions made by the lower courts ...

THE SUPREME COURT OF RUSSIA CLARIFIED THE LIMITS OF MORATORIUM ON INITIATION OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS

... bankruptcy proceedings. However, in subsequent challenges of the claim in the appeal and district courts, the position was found to be incorrect, and the submitted application was returned to the creditor. The reason was the action of the moratorium on bankruptcy in relation to the debtor. The Supreme Court found no reason for the application of the moratorium, having indicated that it was impossible in the case under consideration. The debtor company, in support of its position, referred to the presence of retail trade among the additional ...

THE SUPREME COURT OF RUSSIA: TERMINATION OF BANKRUPTCY CASE IS NOT A GROUND FOR A DENIAL OF A WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUANCE

... appellate instances referred to the lack of such a procedural possibility, given that the bankruptcy proceedings had already been terminated. The district court did not agree... ... basis of a ruling on inclusion in the register of creditors’ claims was possible if the debtor had not lost his legal capacity. However, the creditor's claim was based on another... ... to which the writ of execution had already been issued. The representatives of the Supreme Court supported the district court in terms of the possibility of issuing an...

THE SUPREME COURT OF RUSSIA ADMITTED OFFSETTING OF CLAIMS UNDER INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT IN BANKRUPTCY

The Economic Board of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation considered the case at the request of a bankruptcy trustee. He demanded that the transaction must be invalidated by offsetting similar claims, and the parties to the agreement were the contractor (bankrupt company) and the customer. The courts of three instances sided with the applicant, but the Supreme Court of Russia rejected his claim him. The essence of the dispute arose as a result of the parties' performance of a contract, under which the debtor undertook to perform a certain amount of contract work. Under the terms of the agreement, the customer paid the contractor ...

The Supreme Court of Russia canceled the conclusion of amicable agreement due to the negligence of judges

... Russia considered the case on the complaint of the creditor (bank), which challenged the conclusion of an amicable agreement in the proceedings related to the insolvency case. The lower courts did not see any violations of the applicant's rights, but the Supreme Court sided with the bank. The dispute arose against the background of the bankruptcy of an individual. The debtor citizen was a member of the company with 100% of the shares, which was sold by him to a third party. The bankruptcy trustee challenged the deal and succeeded in declaring it invalid, but before the entry of the judicial act into the force, the ...

THE COURT ASSESSED THE POSSIBILITY FOR THE DEBTOR’S DEPOSIT CONTESTATION

... invalidation of the assignment agreement, under the conditions of which the assignor (bank) received a deposit from the assignee (debtor), was submitted to the highest court for consideration. The initiator of the proceedings was the manager, whose position ... ... inequality. The deposit legally remained with the assignor, since the assignee had violated the terms of the contract. Thus, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation declared the argument that there was no counter-provision under the contract and the fact ...

Sorted by relevance | Sort by date