Search

SUPREME COURT TO RULE ON CONSUMER PENALTY IN BANKRUPTCY

Case no. A40-39025/2021 has been transferred to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes. As part of it, a citizen purchased a product from the debtor's online store, which subsequently did not suit him, which is why he returned the goods to the seller and demanded to return the funds. Without waiting for a response to the claim, the citizen found that the debtor was declared bankrupt under the procedure of the liquidated debtor, and therefore filed a claim with the court to include the amount...

THE SUPREME COURT RECALCULATED THE TERMS IN THE DISPUTE ON SUBSIDIARY LIABILITY

... could not yet know whether Voropayeva had violated the law. Moreover, the impossibility of paying off the entire debt was discovered after the auctions were held and the assets were sold off. As a result, the claim was satisfied. The decision of the ... ... Voropayeva has filed a complaint with the Supreme Court. After all, the courts considered that the director should have declared bankruptcy no later than February 1, 2016. However, in reality, the organization assumed obligations to IESK as early as August ...

THE SUPREME COURT WILL CONSIDER THE DISPUTE ON THE CHANGE OF MOTIVATION WHEN CHALLENGING THE TRANSACTION

A complaint has been submitted to the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes (case no. A32-54359/19). As part of the case, the bankruptcy trustee of the bankrupt debtor filed an application to challenge transactions-transfers of funds at the direction of the debtor. A contract was concluded between the debtor and the customer, under the terms of which the debtor performed the ...

Sorted by relevance | Sort by date