We know everything about bankruptcy
... were introduced against the company, another person, who had the procedural opportunity to challenge the transaction, was appointed to the position of the bankruptcy trustee. This fact confused the lower courts. The issue was finally resolved by the Supreme Court of Russia. As part of the company's bankruptcy case, one of its creditors demanded damages from the bankruptcy trustee. Inaction of the trustee became a justification - when it was necessary to challenge agreements on the withdrawal of ...
Modified: 05.05.2022... assignor to the assignee. Thus, if the assignor (bank) by law had the right to initiate a case on the insolvency of a citizen without additional prolongation of the debt, then the buyer of this debt (the assignee), had the same rights. As a result, the decisions of the lower instances were canceled, and the dispute was sent for reconsideration to work on the errors ( decision No. 306-ES21-19441 of March 18, 2022).
Modified: 03.23.2022... person in question already had liability arising from the surety agreement. Then the dispute was sent for consideration of the Supreme Court of Russia. The Economic Board agreed with the court of first instance, noting that the guarantor's responsibility ... ... Thus, the responsibility is not the same, as it differs in reasons. This means that both varieties have the right to exist ( decision № 308-ES17-15907 (7) dated December 27, 2021).
Modified: 01.11.2022The Economic Board of the Supreme Court of Russia considered the case on the complaint of the debtor, who remained dissatisfied with the result of the decisions made by the lower instances. The judges reinstated the deadline for filing an application for the inclusion in the register of creditors’ claims of a claim of a pledge lender, who failed to do it in time, although the debtor believed that the ...
Modified: 12.16.2021... the commission from, consisted of several parts, and each of them was less than 600 thousand and was based on a separate loan agreement. This argument was not taken into consideration by the lower instances and actually was ignored. As a result, the Supreme Court of Russia canceled the decrees issued by the lower instances and sent the dispute for reconsideration ( decision № 304-ES21-14940 of December 7, 2021 in case No. A45-20530 / 2020).
Modified: 12.09.2021... obligations, the enforcement proceedings against him were terminated, after which he applied to the court with a demand to include the debt to him in the register of creditors’ claims. The courts of three instances consistently satisfied the claim, but such a decision turned out to be erroneous. The Supreme Court of Russia recalled that a claim on a recognized transaction is considered to be declared on time if it has been failed within two months after the entry of a judicial act declaring the transaction invalid into force, which was not done. ...
Modified: 11.25.2021... conclusion of the contract. In particular, he should have confirmed the presence of the company's will to sign the agreement or justify the fact that the entry contained in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities was erroneous with other documents ( decision No. 305-ES21-4104 (2) dated October 14, 2021 in case № A40-84439/2019).
Modified: 11.23.2021The Supreme Court of Russia considered the complaint of one of the prisoners of the prison camp near Khabarovsk, who, after several months of correspondence with another prisoner of the same colony, was forbidden to continue it. Both convicts were serving ...
Modified: 09.16.2021The Supreme Court considered the complaint of the bankrupt company, which remained dissatisfied with the decisions of lower instances. The judges successively recognized the transaction on the alienation of the land plots by the applicant as invalid and made a decision to return the money paid to the buyer's bankruptcy estate. However, the Supreme Court ...
Modified: 03.29.2022... were previously recorded by a judicial act. The creditor's application was satisfied by the court of first instance and the disputed amount was included in the register. However, the three of judges in the appeal doubted the fidelity of the adopted decision and canceled the judicial act. The reasoning part indicated that the applicant filed a claim outside the period of bail agreed upon by the parties. The fact was that the period specified in the main contract had indeed expired. The creditor was ...
Modified: 03.28.2022Sorted by relevance | Sort by date