Search

Search

 

1 - 2 of 2
First | Prev. | 1 | Next | Last

THE SUBSIDIARY OF THE HEAD OF THE COUNTERPARTY COMPANY WILL BE CHECKED BY THE SUPREME COURT

... damage in the amount of 192 million rubles. The arbitration judges considered that they had satisfied Barinov's request for a subsidiary, considered him to be the beneficiary of his personal loan transactions and contracts of the organization controlled ... ... 2.3 billion of debt from its balance sheet. Andrey Barinov disagreed with the court verdicts and filed a complaint with the Supreme Court. In his opinion, even a loss of 192 million could not be a reason for the bank's bankruptcy. In addition, the former ...

Modified: 07.17.2024
bankrupt , bankruptcy , Supreme Court , debt , subsidiary liability , subsidiary , Finprombank , banks
Path: РусБанкрот - СМИ

THE SUPREME COURT OF RUSSIA CLARIFIED THE FEATURES OF BRINGING A HEAD OF COMPANY TO SUBSIDIARY LIABILITY

The bankruptcy trustee of the debtor demanded in court that the former head of the bankrupt company should be brought to subsidiary liability. The reason was the failure to file a bankruptcy petition in court in a situation of growing debts. The ... ... pointing out that the director had unreasonably omitted to act when the company's financial burden was growing. However, the Supreme Court did not agree with this interpretation of the situation. The Economic Board recalled that the question of the validity ...

Modified: 06.24.2021
bankruptcy , Supreme Court , court ruling , subsidiary liability , subsidiary , court
Path: РусБанкрот - СМИ
1 - 2 of 2
First | Prev. | 1 | Next | Last

Sorted by relevance | Sort by date