Search

THE SUPREME COURT SPOKE ABOUT THE HARM TO BUSINESS REPUTATION IN SOCIAL NETWORKS

... damage to business reputation. The courts of three instances supported the plaintiff's arguments, pointing out that the information disseminated by the defendant is defamatory, does not correspond to reality and detracts from business reputation. The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation did not share this position, noting that harm can only be caused by a formed business reputation, and the plaintiff did not provide evidence of the formation of such a reputation. In addition, the supreme court ...

THE SUPREME COURT RECALCULATED THE TERMS IN THE DISPUTE ON SUBSIDIARY LIABILITY

... Judicial Board for Economic Disputes recently had to consider a cassation appeal, which was addressed by the former head of the company "Angarit" Irina Voropaeva. In the insolvency case of the company (No. A19-5157/2017), one of the creditors (JSC "IESK") tried to bring the ex-director to subsidiary liability. However, the issue of calculating the statute of limitations greatly confused the situation in which the judges of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation had to deal with. From December 25, 2014 to June 25, 2019, Irina Voropaeva managed the activities of the Angarit company. According to representatives of "IESK", the woman violated the obligation to ...

THE SUPREME COURT WILL CONSIDER THE DISPUTE ON THE CHANGE OF MOTIVATION WHEN CHALLENGING THE TRANSACTION

... the debtor, in this regard, the rights of the creditor under the obligation fulfilled by him for the debtor to pay for the delivered goods were transferred to the customer. The customer did not agree with this wording and filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, indicating that payments were made by him not at his own expense, as indicated by the courts, but at the expense of existing debts to contractors to speed up the work, which was indicated by the debtor in the text ...

SUPREME COURT TO RULE ON CONSUMER PENALTY IN BANKRUPTCY

... also mentioned that the bankrupt company does not have the right to voluntarily satisfy the requirements, which is why the inclusion of a fine in the register is impossible. The citizen did not agree with this approach and filed a complaint with the Supreme Court, which drew attention to his arguments that the court in any case is obliged to consider the requirement to include a consumer fine in the register, regardless of whether it was declared. Photo: Freepik

Sorted by relevance | Sort by date