We know everything about bankruptcy
... symbols of trademarks (Zenden and Kari) differ so much that they cannot be confused. Experts note that similar "Kari" lawsuits involving the Federal Antimonopoly Service have happened before. In 2020, the shoe chain managed to get the regulator ... ... in the case. The trial is scheduled for the end of February 2024. Judge Natalia Devitskaya will have to find out whether the FAS employees really made a mistake by refusing to initiate an administrative offense case.
Modified: 02.09.2024... ‘Didi’ probably payed extra to drivers because the cost of transportation does not correspond to the market prices. However, considering the situation, Federal Antimonopoly Service did not find any violations on the behalf of ‘Didi’, which led to a lawsuit. The position of the regulator was that the taxi market in Russia is highly concentrated and in order to get there, large investments are required. In addition, the FAS stated that ‘Didi’s’ actions did not violate antimonopoly legislation and among other things, the company did not dominate in the market. ‘Didi’ service appeared in Russia last year, and during this time, it expanded its network to 38 cities. However,...
Modified: 09.09.2021... giving ‘everything for free’ was compared to an ex-boyfriend who could not leave his beloved. However, this time the antimonopoly departments of several regions of the country got interested in the activities of the company. The representatives of FAS of the Chelyabinsk region paid attention to the Sunlight chain only after one of the consumers had complained about the advertisement. Having received another message from the Sunlight company, the citizen complained about the deception. Unreliable ...
Modified: 09.06.2021... Earlier, Tinkoff has already filed claims against telecom operators. The claim has not yet been accepted for consideration, the Federal Antimonopoly Service has been declared a third party in the case. We should note that in March, the bank filed a lawsuit against MTS with a claim for over 1.1 billion rubles. The reason was the operator's unreasonably high prices for SMS messaging. The bank has not yet given official comments on the new lawsuit, but there is a possibility that the case is of the ...
Modified: 06.01.2021Sorted by relevance | Sort by date