We know everything about bankruptcy
The manager applied to the court for bringing the controlling persons to subsidiary responsibility (case no. A67-9420/20). The courts of two instances refused to satisfy the application, recognizing as erroneous the claim that the funds received from the public were spent by the controlling persons at their own discretion ...
Modified: 03.28.2025The creditor applied to the court to hold the controlling person vicariously liable (case no. A43-28416/20). In rejecting the application, the courts of the two instances proceeded from the reasonableness and good faith of the defendant's actions in assuming obligations under the contract. The cassation sent the dispute for reconsideration and noted that the defendant, having concluded general work contracts containing a condition on a fixed price for the work, carried out work by subcontractors...
Modified: 02.12.2025The manager applied to the court for bringing the controlling persons to subsidiary responsibility (case no. A74-14107/19). Partially satisfying the application, the courts of two instances proceeded from the creation by the defendant of a business model of work, where the debtor was assigned the role of a "loss center",...
Modified: 01.16.2025Dmitry Saveliev, who once represented the Tula Region in the Federation Council, is now under arrest. The reason for this was the accusation that Saveliev had organized the liquidation of his former business partner. However, this time the ex-senator also became a defendant in the framework of the subsidy. Uralstroyneft's creditors are demanding to recover more than 3 billion rubles from him and several other persons. The final amount has not yet been determined. It is assumed that its exact value...
Modified: 12.25.2024... Autonomous Okrug found the persons who controlled the activities of SeverStroy Partner guilty of ruining the company (case no.A75-20726/2019). As a result, the ex-beneficiaries of the company, Bogdan Nestor and Andrei Kopaigora, were involved in the subsidiary. Together with them, the financial responsibility will be shared by the ex-head of the company Svetlana Panteleeva. According to the court, their actions made it impossible to satisfy the organization's obligations to creditors. At the very ...
Modified: 12.24.2024... who was staying at a villa in Italy was arrested. In 2021, the authorities of the republic carried out his extradition to Russia. In addition to the daughter of the convicted businessman, his business partner Lilia Akhmetova was also involved in the subsidiary. In a separate proceeding, the court also imposed a penalty in the amount of 42.3 million on Smyshlyaev's ex-wife Vladlena and her sister Diana Rextin.
Modified: 11.12.2024The manager appealed to the court with an application to bring the bank's controlling persons to subsidiary liability (case No. A40-148648/16). The courts of two instances satisfied the application, guided by the fact that the defendants committed actions to approve loans to technical borrowers, which led to the bankruptcy of the bank. The cassation ...
Modified: 10.07.2024In the first 6 months of 2024, the Deposit Insurance Agency brought former bankers to subsidiary liability for a total amount of over 460 billion rubles. In total, the Deposit Insurance Agency managed to recover 77 billion in losses. According to the agency's press service, in the first half of this year, claims in the amount of 234 billion ...
Modified: 08.16.2024... process, on September 27, 2021, Lepikhov was involved in a subsidy. In addition, losses in the amount of 2.8 billion rubles were recovered from the entrepreneur. And a year ago (by a ruling dated August 29, 2023), the court determined the amount of subsidiary liability, adding a debt of 233.6 million to Lepikhov. Financial manager Diana Marenkova, who is dealing with the bankruptcy of a businessman, and his creditor BM-Bank filed petitions with arbitration in November 2023. They demanded to review ...
Modified: 08.06.2024In the framework of the bankruptcy case (No. A40-41566/19), the manager filed an application for bringing to subsidiary responsibility the head of the logistics department of the debtor's parent company. Refusing to satisfy the application, the court of first instance proceeded from the fact that the actions (transactions) imputed to the defendant did not cause ...
Modified: 08.06.2024Sort by relevance | Sorted by date